All Technical Articles
ArchitectureSensing

Weather Deck vs Enclosed Deck Detection

By Engineering — Sensing · February 28, 2026 · 6 min read

SOLAS II-2/20 covers weather-deck suppression. Detection on the same deck differs materially from a deck below — wind, solar and visibility all matter.

A vehicle deck open to weather and a vehicle deck below the freeboard are different operating environments for a detection layer. The same sensor architecture works on both — the calibration and the algorithmic thresholds do not.

Weather deck specifics

  • Strong solar gain on horizontal vehicle surfaces — coherence windows have to handle large environmental deltas.
  • Wind-driven thermal mixing reduces local thermal stratification.
  • Rain and salt-spray exposure on the sensor itself.
  • Line-of-sight detection is more available because vehicles are not stacked under overhead structure.

Enclosed deck specifics

  • Mechanical ventilation produces moving thermal gradients that look like anomalies if not modelled.
  • Cargo density is higher; cell field-of-view crops to one or two vehicles.
  • No solar component, smaller environmental swings — tighter baseline.
  • No line-of-sight from any single mounting point — distributed sensing is required.

Implications for the regulatory split

SOLAS II-2/20 captures suppression on weather decks. The detection conversation on weather decks is closer to the yard-monitoring problem than to the enclosed-deck problem — and it benefits from camera-based imaging as a secondary. Enclosed decks remain a per-vehicle thermal grid problem.

A single product can cover both environments. A single calibration cannot. Treat the deck like the environment it is, not the regulation it sits under.
Frequently asked

Questions, answered

Why are weather decks and enclosed decks two different detection problems?+

The same sensor architecture works on both, but the calibration and algorithmic thresholds do not. Weather decks have strong solar gain, wind-driven thermal mixing, and rain/salt exposure on the sensor, but more available line of sight; enclosed decks have moving ventilation gradients, denser cargo, no solar component, and no line of sight from any single mounting point.

How does detection differ on a weather deck specifically?+

Coherence windows must handle large solar-driven environmental deltas, wind reduces local thermal stratification, and the sensor itself faces rain and salt spray. Because vehicles aren't stacked under overhead structure, line-of-sight detection is more available, so the weather-deck problem is closer to yard monitoring and benefits from camera imaging as a secondary.

Can one product cover both deck types?+

A single product can cover both environments, but a single calibration cannot. SOLAS II-2/20 captures suppression on weather decks; enclosed decks remain a per-vehicle thermal grid problem. The rule is to treat each deck as the environment it is, not the regulation it sits under.

Related reading

Continue the thread