All Case Studies

PCTC Retrofit Pilot: Detection Results

By Vignesh Durai · July 6, 2026 · 3 min read

7,000-CEU car carrier, non-invasive retrofit, full North Atlantic season. The thermal anomaly layer caught what ceiling smoke detection could not.

This pilot measured one thing: how much earlier a per-vehicle thermal anomaly layer flags a developing event than the ceiling smoke detection already fitted to a 7,000-CEU pure car & truck carrier. Three decks were instrumented across a 120-day North Atlantic season with a high battery-electric cargo mix, and every alarm was logged against the vessel's existing detectors on a common time base.

About this case study: it is a representative composite. The vessel, operator and figures are anonymised and combined from RoRoSAFE bench and pilot work under NDA, so read the numbers as illustrative of the method, not as the audited results of a single deployment.

The vessel and the window

  • 7,000-CEU PCTC, North Atlantic / North Europe liner trade.
  • 120-day operating window, nine port calls, winter sea states.
  • Cargo averaged 31% battery-electric vehicles, balance ICE and hybrid.
  • Thermal anomaly layer running alongside, not replacing, fitted smoke and heat detection.

Deployment: non-invasive retrofit

Installation was a non-invasive retrofit with zero hull modification — the vessel stayed in revenue service. Three working days alongside while loading, no hot work, no drydock, and no class-society deviation. The point of a retrofit pilot is to prove the detection value without the cost and downtime of a structural change, and that constraint held for the full season.

Result window

3
confirmed early-warnings, all pre-smoke
21 min
average thermal anomaly lead vs ceiling smoke
0
missed events; 0 false alarms after calibration
"The deck console flagged one vehicle by position. In a winter swell, on a full deck, we would not have found it from the smoke panel until it was a very different problem."
— Chief Officer (operator NDA)

What needed tuning

The first two weeks ran in calibration. Cold-soaked vehicles loaded from a winter quay produced large baseline shifts that the per-vehicle EWMA had to absorb before the magnitude and dwell thresholds settled. Once calibration voyages were replayed and the coherence window tuned to the vessel's ventilation profile, the false-alarm count held at zero for the remainder of the season.

Why non-invasive retrofit is the deployment model

The deployment model is the strategic point, not a footnote. From 1 January 2026, amended SOLAS Chapter II-2 requires individually addressable detection on new vehicle carriers, and the regulatory direction points the same way for existing tonnage — but a structural refit means drydock time most operators cannot spare as yard capacity tightens toward 2027–2028. A non-invasive retrofit that installs alongside in three working days, with no hot work and no class deviation, is what lets an in-service vessel add the layer without an off-cycle docking. Proving that path mattered here as much as the lead-time numbers, because it is the route the existing fleet will have to take to meet the floor without leaving the water.

Why it matters to the operator

Three pre-smoke early-warnings on a single vessel in one season, each locating a specific vehicle 21 minutes ahead of ceiling smoke detection, is the operational case for the layer: it converts a no-warning event into a window where crew can verify and act before flashover. On a deck loading 31% battery-electric cargo, that margin is the variable between a contained incident and the kind of total loss seen on Felicity Ace (2022) and Fremantle Highway (2023).

The retrofit ran as an additional early layer. Class-required smoke and heat detection stayed in place throughout — the pilot measured lead time over them, not a replacement of them.
Conclusion

How RoRoSAFE helps

This is the pilot model RoRoSAFE offers: one deck on a working PCTC, installed alongside the berth without drydock, monitored for a full season. Per-vehicle thermal and vent-gas data is visible on the bridge and ashore, and the pilot ends with a joint insurer and class review. It extends to the full vessel without architectural changes.

Pilot: one deck · installed alongside the berth · no drydock · 6 months of dashboard access

Sources

  • RoRoSAFE retrofit pilot record (operator under NDA) — 7,000-CEU PCTC, 120-day North Atlantic season, 3 of 13 decks, 31% BEV cargo; thermal anomaly layer run alongside fitted smoke/heat detection.
  • IMO — SOLAS Chapter II-2 amendments in force 1 January 2026 (individually addressable detection in vehicle spaces on new vehicle carriers) — the regulatory driver for retrofit demand across existing tonnage.
  • AGCS / Lloyd's List — Felicity Ace (~4,000 vehicles lost, 2022) and Fremantle Highway (3,783 vehicles including 498 BEVs, 2023) — the total-loss outcomes the detection lead time is measured against.
  • RoRoSAFE bench-rig validation program — the staged event catalogue and threshold methodology behind the per-vehicle EWMA calibration referenced above (see 'Inside the Bench-Rig Validation Program').
Frequently asked

Questions, answered

What did the PCTC thermal anomaly detection pilot measure?+

How much earlier a per-vehicle thermal anomaly layer flags a developing event than the ceiling smoke detection already fitted to a 7,000-CEU car carrier. Three decks were instrumented across a 120-day North Atlantic season with a 31% battery-electric cargo mix, and every alarm was logged against the existing detectors on a common time base.

How disruptive was the retrofit installation?+

Minimal. It was a non-invasive retrofit with zero hull modification — three working days alongside while the vessel loaded, no hot work, no drydock, and no class-society deviation. The ship stayed in revenue service, which is the point of validating detection value through a retrofit rather than a structural change.

What were the results?+

Three confirmed early-warnings over the season, all pre-smoke, with an average lead of 21 minutes over ceiling smoke detection and zero missed events. After a two-week calibration phase to absorb cold-soaked winter loading, the false-alarm count held at zero for the rest of the window.

Did it replace the ship's existing fire detection?+

No. The thermal anomaly layer ran alongside the class-required smoke and heat detection, not in place of it. The pilot measured the lead time the early layer provides over fitted equipment — the two are complementary, with one catching the early fault and the other confirming an established fire.

Related reading

Continue the thread