All Case Studies
Multi-FuelPilotLNG

Multi-Fuel Vessel: LNG Bunker-Area Coverage

By Field Engineering · April 12, 2026 · 5 min read

An LNG-fuelled PCTC asked whether the same sensor architecture could extend coverage into the bunker-adjacent spaces. The answer was yes, with limits.

An LNG-fuelled PCTC asked whether the per-vehicle architecture could extend into the bunker-adjacent corridor — the spaces between the LNG storage and the nearest vehicle deck. The motivation was operational, not regulatory: a single observability layer is cheaper than two.

What we adapted

  • Sensor housings with ammonia-tolerant gasket spec (forward-compatible with planned ammonia conversion).
  • Alarm hierarchy split into zones — bunker-area alarms route via a different escalation path than vehicle-deck alarms.
  • Calibration windows lengthened to match the cleaner thermal environment of the bunker corridor.

What did not transfer

  • Cross-cell coherence — the bunker corridor does not have the cargo density to support it.
  • Per-vehicle baseline logic — replaced with a per-zone baseline.
  • The thermal grid alone — the bunker area also needs dedicated LNG leak detection (it has one).
The product extends. The deployment philosophy has to be specific to the space. Conflating bunker monitoring with vehicle-deck monitoring is a category error.
Frequently asked

Questions, answered

Can the per-vehicle architecture extend into LNG bunker-adjacent spaces?+

Yes, with limits. An LNG-fuelled PCTC extended coverage into the corridor between LNG storage and the nearest vehicle deck — motivated operationally, since a single observability layer is cheaper than two. The architecture validated with zone-segregated alarms.

What was adapted for the bunker-adjacent corridor?+

Sensor housings with an ammonia-tolerant gasket spec (forward-compatible with planned ammonia conversion), an alarm hierarchy split into zones so bunker-area alarms route via a different escalation path than vehicle-deck alarms, and longer calibration windows matched to the cleaner thermal environment of the corridor.

What did not transfer to the bunker area?+

Cross-cell coherence (the corridor lacks the cargo density to support it) and per-vehicle baseline logic (replaced with a per-zone baseline). The thermal grid also does not replace dedicated LNG leak detection, which the bunker area still needs. Conflating bunker monitoring with vehicle-deck monitoring is a category error.

Related reading

Continue the thread